Chaos

September 20th, 2008

This past week, I learned that a couple I’m very close to lost their only child, a 21 month old boy, who died tragically and unexpectedly in his sleep. I grew up with this boy’s father and mother and they are very close to my heart.

Today, I attended the memorial service which impacted me very greatly. I watched my friends grieve more deeply than I have ever witnessed and, at the same time, celebrate the joy of the life of their baby boy. You might think it odd that ultimate sorrow and transcendent joy could coexist like this. But it’s actually quite natural when you possess a deep and abiding faith in Jesus Christ as my friends do.

The pastor presiding over the service even spoke about it. He called it chaos. It’s the same dichotomy that runs to the core of our Christian faith, which is at heart a belief in a God who suffered unspeakable agony to die on a cross in order to bring about unending joy through His resurrection. Our God embraced this chaos in order to save us from death. Today, I saw my friends, and to a lesser degree myself, embrace the same chaos in order to let God save us from the pain, and tragedy, and unspeakable sorrow death brings.

I highly recommend you read my friend’s blog post from today, entitled “Our Hope.” See for yourself the power that a strong faith in Christ brings to the chaos that surrounds us. If you don’t have such a faith, now might be a good time to consider it.

It’s not the government’s job to make you 10% per year

July 21st, 2008

When you pay attention to the financial markets and all activity surrounding them, you start to see one simple pattern that pretty much guides everything.

  1. Things go up — everyone’s happy.
  2. Things go down — everyone starts blaming the government.

It would actually be kind of humorous if it weren’t so frustrating. It’s as if the world believes that the purpose of the market is to earn them a return of 10% per year or more, no questions asked. With so many people in our country and around the world tying up their life savings and retirement savings in index-tracking funds and equities, it’s no wonder this is the case. Somewhere along the line everyone started believing that the market would earn them better returns than their bank accounts and … well … they forgot about the risk.

That’s right. In case you didn’t know, there is risk involved in investing in equities or any other financial instrument. That risk exists whether you’re in mutual funds in your 401k or straight-out stocks in your non-retirement funds. Put your money into the market and ten years from now you might have less money than you have now.

Seriously, did anyone notice what just happened to GM. It just hit 50 years lows. Meaning that if you had put your money into old, faithful, GM fifty years ago and held on, today you’d have just about the same amount of money as you did then. No gains, not even inflationary gains.

So I guess it’s no wonder we all just scream for the government to fix things. I mean, it is our nature to blame others. It’s not unexpected, I just wish it weren’t so. Either accept the risks involved in your own financial strategy, or put your money in a bank or money market where you will get a guaranteed, albeit smaller, return.

The mis-use of “begs the question”

July 5th, 2008

Ok, so this is something that’s always bothered me, and I just recently discovered that I’m not alone in my concern over the issue. So very many people misuse the phrase “begs the question.” I take note every time I hear it inappropriately applied, especially in something mainstream like a newspaper or TV broadcast by journalists who should, you would think, work hard to utilize language correctly.

I did a little search on the phrase and found a whole website dedicated to setting the record straight on this. Plus, there are a bunch of other people pontificating about the problem. So, I’ll try not to be too redundant, but just say this:

“Begs the question” does NOT mean “raises the question” or “implies the question” or “makes me want to ask this other question.” It is not correct to say something like “he said he doesn’t like tomatoes, which begs the question ‘why is he growing tomatoes in his back yard?’” While that is the way most everyone uses it, it is not the actual meaning of the phrase.

The correct meaning is explained on the get it right website linked above:

“‘Begging the question’ is a form of logical fallacy in which a statement or claim is assumed to be true without evidence other than the statement or claim itself. When one begs the question, the initial assumption of a statement is treated as already proven without any logic to show why the statement is true in the first place.”

It is a phrase with origins in logic or argument, and it is used most appropriately in legal matters and debate. It is not a phrase that most people have need to use very often. So, the next time you are tempted to throw out the phrase in a simple colloquial context, please think twice and help preserve the true meaning of the phrase. The English language thanks you for it!

Soon, I will be riding a scooter

June 21st, 2008

Today, my wife gave me the ok and I put down a deposit to reserve a new scooter. The picture to the right shows the exact model I ordered. It gets somewhere around 100 miles per gallon. I have been considering getting a scooter for a while now. Nearly 100% of my motivation is for the fuel economy. A tiny percentage of my motivation is that I think they look fun, but that part is offset by the higher risk involved in riding a two wheeled device, so it’s pretty much all about the economics.

Given my driving requirements, I think it is a great fit and I look forward to riding it. I have to wait a bit, however, because they are in great demand so I have to wait for our local shop to get to me on the list. There is a chance it will be within the next week as they think they have a black one coming in June, but there’s no guarantee. We shall see.

Caffeinated iced tea is so much better

June 17th, 2008

I am a big fan of iced tea. Ever since I gave up drinking soft drinks (and lost about ten pounds in a week as a result), unsweetened iced tea has been my beverage of choice.

Recently, however, I realized I was spending quite a bit of money purchasing iced tea at restaurants. They charge you the same amount for iced tea as they do for other beverages. So, it’s maybe $1.50-$2 for tea. When I added up how much I was spending per month on this infused water, I decided something had to change.

So, no more paying for iced tea at restaurants. Well, I’m not saying I’m perfect. Sometimes I break down and just have to get some. But, I can say I have drastically reduced my spending on tea.

Of course, one of the key factors in being able to avoid paying for tea is to have some good tea at home. If I can get my tea fix there, then I’m less tempted to purchase it while out. At home, we’ve been using decaffeinated tea for a long time. I guess I figured “why not?” You know, if you can avoid the caffeine, all the better. However, the taste of the tea hasn’t been enough to replace my tea purchasing tendencies.

So, I finally broke down and tried the caffeinated tea at home, and viola! This is what I’ve been missing in the homemade tea. Who knew that caffeine made such a difference in the taste and the strength? Well, probably everyone knew this except me but now I have discovered it and homemade caffeinated tea is well on its way to replacing my need for tea purchases. Woohoo!

What is a call option?

May 25th, 2008

Let’s say that gas is around $3.75 per gallon. Do you think it’s going higher? No, I mean really. Do you really think it’s going higher in, say, the next three months?

If you do, then you could go on down to your local gas station, meet with the owners and make a proposition. You could tell them this:

“I’d like to enter a contract with you. I want to be able to buy 100 gallons of gas at the current price of $3.75 per gallon at any time between now and the end of August 2008. Can we make a deal?”

Naturally, the gas station owner is going to put a price tag on this deal. After all, why would he lock in this price for you when gas could go higher? On the other hand, for the right price, he might be willing to make this deal. Why? Because it’s also possible that gas doesn’t go higher and selling this contract could bring in some extra cash for him. Let’s say he agrees to sell you this contract for thirty cents per gallon, or $30. You accept and the deal is done.

This contract you have created is a call option on gasoline. It is just like the call options you can easily buy and sell on many stocks, indexes, futures and other products. It has a strike price ($3.75/gallon), an expiration date (August 31, 2008) and a price ($0.30/gallon). It also contains 100 gallons per contract, just as equity / index options usually trade at 100 shares / contract.

Why everyone is a gambler (part 2): risk management

May 18th, 2008

In my previous post, I made the case that everyone is a gambler. I also posed the following question: “what’s the difference between gambling at the casinos and gambling in the stock market or with mutual funds?” I got some thoughtful replies and, after considering it further, decided I would continue the discussion with another post.

To me, casino gambling, stock market investing, starting a business … etc., it’s all a gamble. It’s all the same. There’s no intrinsic difference in the activities themselves. They are all games and they follow the same rules of risk, reward and probability of success.

The difference can only be found in how one approaches and plays the games. It is possible for someone to approach the stock market as a gambler, just as it is possible for a person to treat casino gambling like a business. In my opinion, the difference comes down to one thing: risk management.

Whether you invest your money in stocks or in casino gaming, you are only treating it as an investment if you practice a solid plan of risk management. Without this component, you are simply throwing money toward chance, and it is this practice of betting on chance that gives casino gambling its wasteful reputation. I would argue, however, that it is just as common for people to play in the stock market in a wasteful manner when they don’t practice risk management.

Risk management is a practice of understanding all of the factors that can influence the possible outcomes of your play, and building a solid plan around these principles. Risk management makes it imperative to have a plan in place for your trading or gaming. Without a defined plan, one is not managing risk because without a plan, one will generally just bow to emotion and give in to the feelings of the moment, which almost surely results in loss.

A person who makes a solid profession out of playing poker understands risk management. They have a plan and they practice that plan every time they play. They know how much they are willing to lose on each hand, each game, each month, each year … etc. They know the probabilities for every hand they are dealt and they know how they will react to every possibility they encounter. The professional poker player treats poker like a business. They preserve capital and operate with a plan. To me, this person is investing because they are putting money into a system, or business model, that they believe will be profitable over time. The casino gambler who doesn’t practice risk management, on the other hand, just throws money at chance without a plan in place. This practice relies purely on luck and, over time, this gambler will generally lose.

I think most would agree with the above point, but here’s where I think this intersects with a majority of Americans in ways that most don’t understand. The stock market is also a gamble and unless you practice risk management, you are not really investing, but rather just taking a chance. The “safety net” that has kept most people out of trouble while they have thrown their life savings into mutual funds and stocks is that, over time, the equity markets have appreciated. So, even though people don’t understand what they are really putting at risk, they have come out OK because the markets have saved them by being resilient.

Problem is, the more the market proves itself this way, the more people tend to forget about the risk. It is this psychological phenomenon that led to the housing and credit crisis we are now enduring. People got overconfident about the resilience of housing, thinking it could never go down, and they placed large bets on the belief that housing would always go up. I believe the stock market also holds this illusion of infallibility in the minds of most people. We come to believe that the stock market is a “sure thing” as long as you hold on for the long term. But it’s not a sure thing. The markets do tend to go up over time (at least in recent history), but what if you put your money in at the wrong time? Or, even worse, what if the markets stop going up, or start going down?

We recently got to witness the results of this problem. As the Dow fell from 14,000 to 12,000 recently, the nation started screaming for justice. Everyone looked to blame the politicians or the oil companies or whoever else they could find to blame. Nevermind the fact that the Dow was still holding 12,000, which up until a couple of years ago had never even been hit. Here we are exponentially higher than we have been in recent history and yet our nation was demanding that our leaders do something to stop the decline.

Why does this happen? Because most people have most of their money tied up in the markets or instruments that respond to the markets yet they don’t understand or manage their risk. They simply expect their money to grow year after year and to grow by a hefty percentage at that. This is what years of growth have taught us to rely on. It’s what most people believe to be true. But it’s unfortunate because the truth is that the stock markets, just like the casinos, are a gamble, and to be successful you have to either be lucky, or practice a solid plan of risk management. Most of us have been lucky for the past many decades. But what if that were to change?

Why everyone is a gambler

May 11th, 2008

I’m a pretty serious student of the financial markets these days. The other morning on CNBC, they were doing a little shtick where they were simulating a poker game with some big name hedge fund managers. All the while they were (sort of) playing, they were discussing the similarities between poker and trading. These hedge fund managers had also done well in some professional poker tournaments.

This little vignette solidified something I’d been thinking about for a while. That is, everyone is a gambler.

When you study the markets and people who make a business of trading in the markets, you slowly become aware that everything is simply a game of probabilities, risk and reward (for more of my thoughts on this, you can check out a post a wrote a while back specifically on this subject). These very same principles that allow an individual (or a professional) to make money in the markets also guide the games of chance at the casinos. They also guide pretty much every other decision we make every day of our lives.

When asked about the similarities of trading and playing poker, one of the hedge fund guys explained that in both cases, you are presented with a certain amount of information, but there is always a piece of information that you don’t have. You have to make a decision on how to handle that missing piece of information based on your understanding of the information you do have. You make a decision, place your bets, and hope for the best.

Honestly, can you say that this is different than anything else in life? There is no certainty about tomorrow. We are always dealing with an incomplete information set and making decisions the best we can based on what we know. When it gets right down to it, we always have to move forward, choose our path, and hope for the best.

This is why I say everyone is a gambler. So, why do we consider gambling to be “bad”? What makes tying up hundreds of thousands of retirement dollars in equity-based mutual funds (which can lose their value) any more virtuous than hitting the casinos? Or, what about the person who invests a large portion of their net worth into a new business venture — are they somehow more noble than the blackjack player? I have some thoughts, but I’d like to hear yours first in the comments. What do you think?

Move Up downtown living tour

May 4th, 2008

Yesterday, we went to out to the downtown living tour here in OKC. This was a cool event with 11 downtown residential properties having simultaneous open houses so people could tour and see how living in downtown OKC is shaping up.

Since I live near downtown, I am very interested in how the residential life in downtown is coming along. I am really excited for the development that is happening and hope there is great success with occupancy so that we will have continued development as well, and hopefully even get some more retail options and even an urban grocery store some time (Whole Foods, anyone??).

Anyway, there were some great properties to see. Maybe a third of them were older properties and buildings that are being restored and converted to residential, with the rest being new construction. The new stuff is primarily over in the triangle north of Bricktown with the older buildings being in downtown and midtown.

Personally, my favorite was the old Sieber Hotel in midtown. This very old six story structure is being nicely restored to residential rental apartments with some upscale features. There are crown moldings, modern kitchens, tiled bathrooms, and some beautiful windows. I just don’t think there’s a substitute for a historical structure, no matter how nicely you build something new.

Hadden Hall was another property in midtown that looks like it will be similar to the Sieber, but it was just beginning its restoration so there was nothing really to see yet.

Right Portion, Right Price

April 30th, 2008

I’m not a big T.G.I. Friday’s fan, but I was intrigued when I saw their new campaign for the “Right Portion, Right Price” menu. Those of you who know how I feel about portion sizes will find it no surprise that I love this campaign. I love the name, in fact. I think it’s great branding.

The tagline is: “Save that stuffed feeling for your wallet.” Nice. They are not only promoting the idea of smaller portions, but also charging less money for the right amount of food.

I’ve written before about what happened to Ruby Tuesday’s when they tried to reduce portion sizes. I think the difference there was that they didn’t change the price, at least not enough. I think this T.G.I. Friday’s campaign will be a good test of whether the public will accept a mainline chain restaurant trying to serve them a correct portion size, or if they will demand to stuff themselves beyond what is reasonable.

I am very interested to see the results of this campaign.