Archive for May, 2008

What is a call option?

Sunday, May 25th, 2008

Let’s say that gas is around $3.75 per gallon. Do you think it’s going higher? No, I mean really. Do you really think it’s going higher in, say, the next three months?

If you do, then you could go on down to your local gas station, meet with the owners and make a proposition. You could tell them this:

“I’d like to enter a contract with you. I want to be able to buy 100 gallons of gas at the current price of $3.75 per gallon at any time between now and the end of August 2008. Can we make a deal?”

Naturally, the gas station owner is going to put a price tag on this deal. After all, why would he lock in this price for you when gas could go higher? On the other hand, for the right price, he might be willing to make this deal. Why? Because it’s also possible that gas doesn’t go higher and selling this contract could bring in some extra cash for him. Let’s say he agrees to sell you this contract for thirty cents per gallon, or $30. You accept and the deal is done.

This contract you have created is a call option on gasoline. It is just like the call options you can easily buy and sell on many stocks, indexes, futures and other products. It has a strike price ($3.75/gallon), an expiration date (August 31, 2008) and a price ($0.30/gallon). It also contains 100 gallons per contract, just as equity / index options usually trade at 100 shares / contract.

Why everyone is a gambler (part 2): risk management

Sunday, May 18th, 2008

In my previous post, I made the case that everyone is a gambler. I also posed the following question: “what’s the difference between gambling at the casinos and gambling in the stock market or with mutual funds?” I got some thoughtful replies and, after considering it further, decided I would continue the discussion with another post.

To me, casino gambling, stock market investing, starting a business … etc., it’s all a gamble. It’s all the same. There’s no intrinsic difference in the activities themselves. They are all games and they follow the same rules of risk, reward and probability of success.

The difference can only be found in how one approaches and plays the games. It is possible for someone to approach the stock market as a gambler, just as it is possible for a person to treat casino gambling like a business. In my opinion, the difference comes down to one thing: risk management.

Whether you invest your money in stocks or in casino gaming, you are only treating it as an investment if you practice a solid plan of risk management. Without this component, you are simply throwing money toward chance, and it is this practice of betting on chance that gives casino gambling its wasteful reputation. I would argue, however, that it is just as common for people to play in the stock market in a wasteful manner when they don’t practice risk management.

Risk management is a practice of understanding all of the factors that can influence the possible outcomes of your play, and building a solid plan around these principles. Risk management makes it imperative to have a plan in place for your trading or gaming. Without a defined plan, one is not managing risk because without a plan, one will generally just bow to emotion and give in to the feelings of the moment, which almost surely results in loss.

A person who makes a solid profession out of playing poker understands risk management. They have a plan and they practice that plan every time they play. They know how much they are willing to lose on each hand, each game, each month, each year … etc. They know the probabilities for every hand they are dealt and they know how they will react to every possibility they encounter. The professional poker player treats poker like a business. They preserve capital and operate with a plan. To me, this person is investing because they are putting money into a system, or business model, that they believe will be profitable over time. The casino gambler who doesn’t practice risk management, on the other hand, just throws money at chance without a plan in place. This practice relies purely on luck and, over time, this gambler will generally lose.

I think most would agree with the above point, but here’s where I think this intersects with a majority of Americans in ways that most don’t understand. The stock market is also a gamble and unless you practice risk management, you are not really investing, but rather just taking a chance. The “safety net” that has kept most people out of trouble while they have thrown their life savings into mutual funds and stocks is that, over time, the equity markets have appreciated. So, even though people don’t understand what they are really putting at risk, they have come out OK because the markets have saved them by being resilient.

Problem is, the more the market proves itself this way, the more people tend to forget about the risk. It is this psychological phenomenon that led to the housing and credit crisis we are now enduring. People got overconfident about the resilience of housing, thinking it could never go down, and they placed large bets on the belief that housing would always go up. I believe the stock market also holds this illusion of infallibility in the minds of most people. We come to believe that the stock market is a “sure thing” as long as you hold on for the long term. But it’s not a sure thing. The markets do tend to go up over time (at least in recent history), but what if you put your money in at the wrong time? Or, even worse, what if the markets stop going up, or start going down?

We recently got to witness the results of this problem. As the Dow fell from 14,000 to 12,000 recently, the nation started screaming for justice. Everyone looked to blame the politicians or the oil companies or whoever else they could find to blame. Nevermind the fact that the Dow was still holding 12,000, which up until a couple of years ago had never even been hit. Here we are exponentially higher than we have been in recent history and yet our nation was demanding that our leaders do something to stop the decline.

Why does this happen? Because most people have most of their money tied up in the markets or instruments that respond to the markets yet they don’t understand or manage their risk. They simply expect their money to grow year after year and to grow by a hefty percentage at that. This is what years of growth have taught us to rely on. It’s what most people believe to be true. But it’s unfortunate because the truth is that the stock markets, just like the casinos, are a gamble, and to be successful you have to either be lucky, or practice a solid plan of risk management. Most of us have been lucky for the past many decades. But what if that were to change?

Why everyone is a gambler

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

I’m a pretty serious student of the financial markets these days. The other morning on CNBC, they were doing a little shtick where they were simulating a poker game with some big name hedge fund managers. All the while they were (sort of) playing, they were discussing the similarities between poker and trading. These hedge fund managers had also done well in some professional poker tournaments.

This little vignette solidified something I’d been thinking about for a while. That is, everyone is a gambler.

When you study the markets and people who make a business of trading in the markets, you slowly become aware that everything is simply a game of probabilities, risk and reward (for more of my thoughts on this, you can check out a post a wrote a while back specifically on this subject). These very same principles that allow an individual (or a professional) to make money in the markets also guide the games of chance at the casinos. They also guide pretty much every other decision we make every day of our lives.

When asked about the similarities of trading and playing poker, one of the hedge fund guys explained that in both cases, you are presented with a certain amount of information, but there is always a piece of information that you don’t have. You have to make a decision on how to handle that missing piece of information based on your understanding of the information you do have. You make a decision, place your bets, and hope for the best.

Honestly, can you say that this is different than anything else in life? There is no certainty about tomorrow. We are always dealing with an incomplete information set and making decisions the best we can based on what we know. When it gets right down to it, we always have to move forward, choose our path, and hope for the best.

This is why I say everyone is a gambler. So, why do we consider gambling to be “bad”? What makes tying up hundreds of thousands of retirement dollars in equity-based mutual funds (which can lose their value) any more virtuous than hitting the casinos? Or, what about the person who invests a large portion of their net worth into a new business venture — are they somehow more noble than the blackjack player? I have some thoughts, but I’d like to hear yours first in the comments. What do you think?

Move Up downtown living tour

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

Yesterday, we went to out to the downtown living tour here in OKC. This was a cool event with 11 downtown residential properties having simultaneous open houses so people could tour and see how living in downtown OKC is shaping up.

Since I live near downtown, I am very interested in how the residential life in downtown is coming along. I am really excited for the development that is happening and hope there is great success with occupancy so that we will have continued development as well, and hopefully even get some more retail options and even an urban grocery store some time (Whole Foods, anyone??).

Anyway, there were some great properties to see. Maybe a third of them were older properties and buildings that are being restored and converted to residential, with the rest being new construction. The new stuff is primarily over in the triangle north of Bricktown with the older buildings being in downtown and midtown.

Personally, my favorite was the old Sieber Hotel in midtown. This very old six story structure is being nicely restored to residential rental apartments with some upscale features. There are crown moldings, modern kitchens, tiled bathrooms, and some beautiful windows. I just don’t think there’s a substitute for a historical structure, no matter how nicely you build something new.

Hadden Hall was another property in midtown that looks like it will be similar to the Sieber, but it was just beginning its restoration so there was nothing really to see yet.