<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why your fancy website sucks.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/</link>
	<description>Hi, I'm Tim, and this is my blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Tim,

I read your article on CMS, and I have to say AMEN as well.  I have spent a lot of time speaking and trying to educate churches on why fancy is not better not to mention  the tacky factor.  As an SEO/PPC Specialist I cringe when I get a request for a search engine evaluation and they have an all flash site.  I keep hoping that churches will get the fact that visitors are going to go to their site before they actually visit and if they seem some gaudy and or flash website they will carry that impression with them whether they actually attend or not.  Keep up the good work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>I read your article on CMS, and I have to say AMEN as well.  I have spent a lot of time speaking and trying to educate churches on why fancy is not better not to mention  the tacky factor.  As an SEO/PPC Specialist I cringe when I get a request for a search engine evaluation and they have an all flash site.  I keep hoping that churches will get the fact that visitors are going to go to their site before they actually visit and if they seem some gaudy and or flash website they will carry that impression with them whether they actually attend or not.  Keep up the good work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mean Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Mean Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailygenesis.com/2007/07/12/why-your-fancy-website-sucks/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>"&lt;i&gt;No matter our skill set, we all fall victim to the insatiable desire for fanciness.&lt;/i&gt;" - Tim Wall

Amen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;<i>No matter our skill set, we all fall victim to the insatiable desire for fanciness.</i>&#8221; - Tim Wall</p>
<p>Amen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
